您所在的位置:华人博彩论坛 - 学术研究 - 学术信息

学术信息

【讲座通知】华人博彩策略论坛 金融学院SBF论坛2021年第2讲

image.png

讲座题目:Prediction and Prevention of Disproportionally Influential Agents in Complex Networks

时间:2021年4月8日(周四)12:25– 13:25 博学楼925(线下)

主讲人: Sandro Lera南方科技大学风险分析预测与管控研究院、信息系统与管理工程系双聘助理教授、博士生导师。

主讲人简介:

Sandro Lera南方科技大学风险分析预测与管控研究院、信息系统与管理工程系双聘助理教授、博士生导师。他也是美国麻省理工学院访问学者,之前在美国麻省理工学院媒体实验室(MIT Media Lab)师从著名数据科学家Alex Pentland任博士后。研究方向主要为复杂系统、网络科学、量化金融等。此外,Sandro Lera具有算法交易的行业背景,并为多家国际知名公司制定量化交易策略。文章的共同作者是麻省理工学院(MIT)的Alex Pentland教授和南方科技大学风险分析预测与管控研究院院长Didier Sornette教授。

讲座内容简介:

We develop an early warning system and subsequent optimal intervention policy to avoid the formation of disproportional dominance (“winner takes all,” WTA) in growing complex networks. This is modeled as a system of interacting agents, whereby the rate at which an agent establishes connections to others is proportional to its already existing number of connections and its intrinsic fitness. We derive an exact four-dimensional phase diagram that separates the growing system into two regimes: one where the “fit get richer” and one where, eventually, the WTA. By calibrating the system’s parameters with maximum likelihood, its distance from the unfavorable WTA regime can be monitored in real time. This is demonstrated by combining the theory with big data in two applications: the social trading platform eToro and US supply-chain networks.

The eToro social trading platform where users mimic each other’s trades. If the system state is within or close to the WTA regime, we show how to efficiently control the system back into a more stable state along a geodesic path in the space of fitness distributions. We analyze (US) supply chain data in context of our model, and find that the common measure of penalizing the most dominant agents does not solve sustainably the problem of drastic inequity. Instead, interventions that first create a critical mass of high-fitness individuals followed by pushing the relatively low-fitness individuals upward is the best way to avoid swelling inequity and escalating fragility.

Our results call for a more wholistic approach, with important implications for the structure of regulatory matters such as antitrust policies, taxation law, subsidies, or development aid.